Midterm outcome after aortic root replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE Midterm clinical outcome was evaluated after aortic root replacement with Freestyle® stentless aortic root bioprostheses. METHODS Between April 1996 and December 2007, 301 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with stentless Medtronic Freestyle® bioprostheses in full-root technique at a single center. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was required in 96 patients (32%). In 94 patients (31%), the ascending aorta was replaced. The mean age was 71.6 ± 9.1 (range: 36-89) years. Follow-up was closed in October 2008, 99% complete and encompassed 916 patient-years. RESULTS Overall mortality within 30 days was 5%. A total of 62 patients died during the follow-up period. Overall survival at 5 and 9 years was 74 ± 4% and 53 ± 6%, respectively. Re-operations were required in three patients: in one patient due to structural valve deterioration, and in two patients due to prosthetic valve endocarditis. Non-structural dysfunctions were not observed. In eight patients, prosthetic valve endocarditis occurred, in most of them (N = 6) during the first year after surgery. Rate of freedom from re-operation, structural valve deterioration, prosthetic valve endocarditis, thrombo-embolic and major bleeding events at 9 years was 94 ± 6%, 94 ± 6%, 94 ± 3%, 87 ± 5%, and 95 ± 2%, respectively. The linearized rates of late adverse events in percent per patient-year were 0.35, 0.12, 0.83, 1.7, and 0.7, respectively, for re-operation, structural valve deterioration, prosthetic valve endocarditis, thrombo-embolic and major bleeding events. A little less than a quarter (22%) of the patients required anticoagulation therapy. CONCLUSIONS Aortic root replacement with the stentless Freestyle® bioprosthesis provided a respectable short-term mortality, optimal valve durability and acceptable rates of valve-related complications within 9 years.
منابع مشابه
Structural Valve Deterioration After Aortic Valve Replacement with Medtronic Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprostheses
The Medtronic freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) is a stentless valve with an effective orifice area that is larger than that observed on other bioprostheses. However, there have been sporadic reports of structural valve deterioration (SVD), such as aortic root wall rupture, leaflet tearing, and pseudoaneurysm formation. We report five cases of SVD of fr...
متن کاملStentless aortic valve replacement: an update
Although porcine aortic valves or pericardial tissue mounted on a stent have made implantation techniques easier, these valves sacrifice orifice area and increase stress at the attachment of the stent, which causes primary tissue failure. Optimizing hemodynamics to prevent patient-prosthetic mismatch and improve durability, stentless bioprostheses use was revived in the early 1990s. The purpose...
متن کاملStentless aortic valves. Current aspects
The design of stentless valve prostheses is intended to achieve a more physiological flow pattern and superior hemodynamics in comparison to stented valves. First - generation stentless bioprosthesis were the Prima valve, the Freestyle valve and the Toronto stentless porcine valve. The second generation of stentless valves, as the Super stentless aortic porcine valve, need only one suture line....
متن کاملMid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.
OBJECTIVE To assess the benefit for patients older than 65 years of aortic valve replacement with stentless biological heart valves in comparison with mechanical valves. DESIGN Multiple regression analysis of a retrospective follow up study. SETTING Single cardiothoracic centre. PATIENTS Between 1996 and 2001, 392 patients with a mean age of 74 years underwent aortic valve replacement wit...
متن کاملCARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves
Objective: To assess the benefit for patients older than 65 years of aortic valve replacement with stentless biological heart valves in comparison with mechanical valves. Design: Multiple regression analysis of a retrospective follow up study. Setting: Single cardiothoracic centre. Patients: Between 1996 and 2001, 392 patients with a mean age of 74 years underwent aortic valve replacement with ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
دوره 40 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011